On Tue, Nov 6, 2007 at 20:54:29 +0000, Neil Williams wrote: > On Tue, 6 Nov 2007 14:37:56 -0500 > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And things shouldn't be "must" in policy unless they're intended to be RC > > bugs. I don't see how this would ever make sense to be a "must". > > Why? Any test suite that runs compiled binaries must be completely > disabled for cross-compiling and there are few test suites that would > not be disabled under such a rule. Are you saying that cross compiling > alone is not sufficiently important to be the cause of a *must* in > Policy? > Yes.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
