On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:42:03PM +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > > nocheck | notest should also be supported whether or not the package is > > actually being cross-built. emdebuild currently passes 'nocheck' as > > part of the DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS for all Emdebian builds. > > Imho this should be either nocheck or notest, supporting both is a bit > pointless. Using notest or nocheck is also pretty useful for debugging > purposes, if you don't need a lengthy test but want to have a new build > fast.
I think all the toolchain packages use nocheck - at least binutils, glibc and gcc do (I filed bugs for a couple of them). I wanted to get around to introduce nocheck in a couple more packages, but maybe it's better to just settle on it now and propose it for policy inclusion for lenny. Which package is using notest? Last I looked perl had a non-standard way (x-no-test or so) and I filed a bug to change that to nocheck as well. So let's agree on nocheck? Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
