On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 06:54:49AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 02:22:38PM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 10:38:41PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > > > > Then he'll be able to move /bin/sh symlink on bash if he wants to.
> > > > > Right. Hence that's the point for the user to change /bin/sh. :) > > > > > I have no problem with dash being the default. I was just defending > > > > > our > > > > > committment to let the user change /bin/sh if they want to. > > > > Yes, I never thought we were about to remove the fact that /bin/sh was > > > > a symlink that the user could be able to change whenever he wants. I > > > > don't think debconf questions or alike are wise FWIW though. > > > So how will be that achieved in a way that's persistant across upgrades, > > > if both debconf and alternatives are being rejected? > > diversions. > diversions are far from being atomic. True, but it is persistent across upgrades and doesn't require any particular support from the package. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
