Stefano Zacchiroli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Since my assumption was wrong: what about creating a "bzr-addons" > Debian package containing the most used bzr addons out there instead > of filing an ITP for just one?
What about creating a 'bzr-addons' package that *depends* on those package-per-module addon packages? That seems like less hassle (and therefore more likely to be maintained) than packaging multiple independent upstream packages under one Debian package. -- \ "Even if the voices in my head are not real, they have pretty | `\ good ideas." -- Anonymous | _o__) | Ben Finney -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
