Hello, On Le Tuesday 15 May 2007, à 14:01:28, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > Testing should simply be the place where _platform_ changes are shaken > > out, not the "input buffer for the new software". > > Actually sid is where the platform changes are done. And once they're OK, > they get moved to testing in a coherent manner. So testing should stay > usable.
And you can also look at [CUT][] which seems a project to fit well desktop user's needs. [CUT]: <http://kitenet.net/~joey/code/debian/cut/> "Constantly Usable Testing" François Post Scriptum : [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in <http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2007/04/msg00427.html> > > CUT was exactly what testing was supposed to be, in the beginning. > Period. It hasn't become that. It has gotten to the point that > sometimes > testing is borkdened for long periods of time... in small areas mind > you, but still broken. which I agree even in a lot of case testing is really usable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
