On Sun, 22 Apr 2007, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 10:20:55PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote: > > > cdebootstrap sid failed today : > > > O: The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > O: libsasl2: Depends: libsasl2-2 (= 2.1.22.dfsg1-8+b1) but 2.1.22.dfsg1-9 > > is to be installed > > > I'm not quite sure why cdebootstrap is trying to pull in libsasl2; > > all packages in base seem to have already migrated to libsasl2-2. > > Probably because libsasl2 itself is prio: important?
We could have avoided this by downgrading libsasl2 to standard in etch. I don't understand why do we insist on being ultra-conservative about fixing wrong package priorities before a release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
