Hi On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:56:23 +0200 Bart Martens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 07:43 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > The relation between Rejects and Voters is currently the highest we
> > ever had. I'm just asking whether we need some technical improvement
> > here because I personally add a count of three to the rejects and
> > have no idea how to vote successfully.
>
> I had problems with encrypted voting. Unencrypted voting worked for me.
Same here, tried encrypted first, it failed (see bellow), then
unencrypted and it worked fine.
The folowing errors were reported:
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
There was a problem verifying the signature on the ballot.
GPG did not return a fingerprint or key id
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
gpg: WARNING: unsafe permissions on homedir
`/org/vote.debian.org/data/leader2007' gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit
ELG-E key, ID 05C78623, created 2004-01-10 gpg: encrypted with 2048-bit
ELG-E key, ID 43C42E9B, created 2007-03-09 [GNUPG:] ENC_TO
E1427DEB43C42E9B 16 0[GNUPG:] USERID_HINT E1427DEB43C42E9B DPL Vote
2007 (Ephemeral Key) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[GNUPG:]
NEED_PASSPHRASE E1427DEB43C42E9B 7C9FC748EBF31170 16 0[GNUPG:]
GOOD_PASSPHRASE[GNUPG:] ENC_TO 6EFA5AE205C78623 16 0[GNUPG:] NO_SECKEY
6EFA5AE205C78623[GNUPG:] BEGIN_DECRYPTION[GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 62
1174979122 [GNUPG:] DECRYPTION_OKAY[GNUPG:] GOODMDC[GNUPG:]
END_DECRYPTION-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
--
Michal Čihař | http://cihar.com | http://blog.cihar.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
