"cobaco (aka Bart Cornelis)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Automatically orphaning such packages has problems as Russel pointed out, > but a "needs co-maintainers"/"needs hijacking" list of packages where > DD's can be more aggressive in jumping/taking over in seems a good idea > IMO.
You could allow and encourage NMUs for bugs of priority less than important that are more than 6 months old. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
