On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Ben Finney wrote: > So, why does the vote result show a number of votes which has no > relevance to the number of votes that actually affected the result?
Because later votes superceed earlier ones. > In other words, why is the unqualified "number of votes" in the > report not the obvious "number of votes that actually affected the > result"? That's what the unique voters number is. If it's too confusing for you, then suggest a less confusing replacement in a patch to Manoj. Don Armstrong -- There is no such thing as "social gambling." Either you are there to cut the other bloke's heart out and eat it--or you're a sucker. If you don't like this choice--don't gamble. -- Robert Heinlein _Time Enough For Love_ p250 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
