On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 02:55:39AM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > And btw, help for bug triaging for any of those kind of packages is > vastly appreciated... But here is a newsflash: 100 bugs is fairly easy > to reduce. the 5 or 600 bugs the KDE team has closed was a year of work. > Yes a damn year, during which there has been many upstream releases > (getting a release ready is a week of work, plus the RC that always come > with them, so you can add another week on top of this one). So please > explain me how a team that has had sometimes less of 2 to 3 _actually active_ > members at a given time do manage to keep up with bugs as well ? I'll > tell you: they just don't. > > Sorry to seem pissed, but well, I am. Your mail (and others with the > same thoughts) are completely disconnected from reality. Totally. > Sorry. I was arguing for the value of bug triage and communicating with submitters. I still on't think that holding up migration over unanswered bugs is a good idea. Hope that clears things up for you.
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sanchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
