On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 11:53:23AM -0600, Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 22-Feb-07, 11:00 (CST), Sune Vuorela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (This problem was reported in bug #411652) > > > > > > I think someone deserves a serious thwacking... > > > > Maybe the maintainer for making non-binNMU-safe packages ? > > That is so much bullshit. Whoever uploaded the binNMU uploaded broken > packages. No excuses. End of story. > > Now, it may be that the bacula package could be improved to generate > better results for a binNMU. The proper way to do that is to submit > bugs, preferably with patches, so that the bacula maintainer can fix > the source packages. Broken uploads are Not The Right Thing.
Aren't binNMUs autobuilded ? Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
