On Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > No, it's a configuration error on your part. How is NSS supposed to know > > which is the "right" name for uid 0 when you've overloaded the uid with more > > than one username? If you don't ensure a unique mapping, NSS is free to > > pick whichever mapping suits it at the time. > I thought that in order of occurrence... > ok - then it is sash bug since its postinst script is the one which > created those entries. Thanks ;-)
Actually it seems to be not mine, and not sash fault -- it seems to be a common practice mentioned in multiple howto's around the web such like http://linuxgazette.net/issue48/tag/16.html Also it used to work and now failed, so I suspect that there was some behavioral change in libc6 nss behavior... Please prove me that I am wrong... -- .-. =------------------------------ /v\ ----------------------------= Keep in touch // \\ (yoh@|www.)onerussian.com Yaroslav Halchenko /( )\ ICQ#: 60653192 Linux User ^^-^^ [175555] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
