On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 01:50:39PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/11/07 12:58, =?//TRANSLIT?Q?Lo=EFc?= Minier wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2007, Ron Johnson wrote: > >>>> * URL : http://www.example.org/ > >>> No upstream website I know of. > >> FTP site? > >> Where do you get the source from? > > > > ftp.gnome.org, but not worth mentionning in the package description; > > it's mentionned in the copyright of course. I imagine people reading > > ITPs are curious of homepages, not of where to get the tarball from. > > > >>>> * License : LGPL, GPL, BSD > >>> (This is correct.) > >> It's tri-licensed? > > > > No, it's a mixture. > > I smell a long thread on -legal.
Why? All these licenses are compatible. Depending on what the GPL-only code is used for, the resulting library will either be GPL or LGPL. Finding out which should be quite simple. Regards: David -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
