On Sat, Jan 20, 2007 at 06:34:18AM -0500, Greg Folkert wrote: > On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 11:51 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le samedi 20 janvier 2007 à 04:30 -0500, Greg Folkert a écrit : > > > I would assert they are not listening to their former BIGGEST fans and > > > users. You can easily find droves rants/discussions of current GNOME > > > users very disgruntled with the REMOVAL of features that previously were > > > there. Some users are now FORMER GNOME users due to these removals. > > > > Features. Features, features, features. Do you only want features, > > without even knowing whether they are useful? Sorry, usability is not > > about features. > > Are you telling me that these features I keep see getting removed are > *NOT* about usability for me? OK, functionality to me... Functionality > for me determines my usability. It I have to use some archaic command > like (btw I don't really mind them *IF* they are well documented) but > like: > gconftool-2.3-1-9.mark32 -a2 -r4 --/usr/sbin/someothercommand \ > \-\-optionforexternalcommand -32 --etc -e -t-c \ > --corruptmysettingsplease
You *do* know that there is a graphical gconf-editor, right? [snip] Regards: David -- /) David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /) Rime on my window (\ // ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ // Diamond-white roses of fire // \) http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/ (/ Beautiful hoar-frost (/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]