On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:37:03PM +0100, Jorge Salamero Sanz wrote: > On Friday 05 January 2007 13:09, Steve Kemp wrote: > > ? If going down the XML route then I see no real reason to have > > ?a distinct file per version. ?Instead have something like: > > we should be careful with one xml for all versions if we want to change > something in the future.
Surely that would be another argument in *favour* of XML? (My understanding is that clients are supposed to ignore tags they don't recognise ..) Steve -- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
