--- Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió: > On Thu, 4 Jan 2007 10:02:16 +0100 (CET), Miriam Ruiz > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > Anyway, I don't think that classification will fit Debian's > > needs. It's self described as "sex of a subject for clinical > > purposes, such as the selection of sex-based grown metrics". To > > start with, it talks about sex, and not gender. Even more, I don't > > think medical or clinical data should go into Debian's LDAP. > > Err, so now the specification of a binary gender field is > unacceptable and confidential medical information that should be > expunged from db.d.o?
Sorry? I guess you misundestood my mail. I was answering kev's suggestion about the standard described at http://medical.nema.org/Dicom/CP/CPack_23/cp373_lb.pdf Miry __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ¡gratis! Regístrate ya - http://correo.yahoo.es -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
