On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 03:21:46PM +0100, Georg Neis wrote: > > Also, but maybe you already did that, sorry in that case, please > > consider joining the pkg-ocaml-maint project on alioth which is used to > > collaboratively maintain (and hence keep consistence) all OCaml-related > > packages in Debian. > Good idea!
I just approved your addition to the project, please take some time to study the Debian OCaml Packaging Policy [1] before starting working on the package. > > Get rid of "ocamlwc" at the beginning of the long description, it's > > pointless to repeat package name there. > Hmm, this seems strange to me. What do you suggest? > I bet nearly every long description starts with the name of the > corresponding software. Your bet is wrong :) Generally speaking, follow the guidelines for packages description available at [2]. Cheers. [1] http://pkg-ocaml-maint.alioth.debian.org/ocaml_packaging_policy.html/ [2] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-best-pkging-practices.en.html#s-bpp-desc-basics -- Stefano Zacchiroli -*- Computer Science PhD student @ Uny Bologna, Italy [EMAIL PROTECTED],debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/ (15:56:48) Zack: e la demo dema ? /\ All one has to do is hit the (15:57:15) Bac: no, la demo scema \/ right keys at the right time
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
