On Dec 19, Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thoughts/suggestions welcome! Have I missed anything screamingly
> obvious here?
update-inetd is a steaming piece of crap which badly needs to be
rewritten.
(But still, most packages apparently manage to use it to get decent
results.)

-- 
ciao,
Marco

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to