Santiago Vila schrieb am Freitag, den 15. Dezember 2006: > On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > > Santiago Vila schrieb am Mittwoch, den 13. Dezember 2006: > > > > > While we are at it, allowing each user to choose among several popular > > > DNSBLs would be great too. In fact, there is a dnslists file in /etc/exim4 > > > which already contains several role accounts (and at least one which is > > > not). > > > We would just need to modify db.debian.org slightly so that such file > > > is generated automatically from email preferences in our LDAP database. > > > > No, please don't do this. Using _one_ rbl to decide if to reject a mail ist > > broken. You should never rely on one external source for deciding if you > > should accept a mail. I would consider every system broken that works like > > this. It would be ok to ask >= 3 lists and to reject if all or most of them > > listed the ip. > > Please *login* to master.debian.org and *read* /etc/exim4/dnslists. > > Five role accounts and another one which is not a role account are > already using a "single" DNSBL, namely sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org. > > I think we, common developers, should also have the freedom to use > sbl-xbl or not. If I chose to do so, it would be for *my* email, not > for *yours*, so please don't try to tell me what it's ok or what > it's not. Receiving more than 100 spams a day certainly is not. Then I consider it double broken, spamhaus ist not an acceptable list. And its not ok to block against a single list.
Alex -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
