On Mon, 11 Dec 2006 10:01:58 +0100, Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 11:08:56 +0100, Andreas Metzler
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Afaik there are no changes in behavior. blocks are only
>> informational.
> If this is true, it is a _TOTAL_ surprise for me. We need better
> documentation.
Out of curiousity, what _did_ you expect the blocking tag to
do? If there is an obvious answer to that, I can see why not having
that behaviour would be a surprise. Since I can't come up with a
reasonable response to "what additional behaviour should adding a
block on one bug by another bug should entail", I am unsurprised that
it does little else than add an informational link between the bugs.
manoj
--
It's now the GNU Emacs of all terminal emulators. Linus Torvalds,
regarding the fact that Linux started off as a terminal emulator
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/~srivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
