On Saturday 28 October 2006 23:56, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > Is that really a good idea for something that is so young and > > untested, so shortly before the release? > > Is it wanted for all architectures, for all systems, irrespective of > > their speed? > > Calm down Frans, what about aiglx then?
Yes, possibly the same goes for aiglx. > I wrote 'if there will be no > regressions', that's up to XSF and the users using unstable and even > testing tell us. I still trust our release process (as in > unstable->testing). The problem that we hardly have the time to get feedback. I do know that I currently see loads of bug reports passing by on the debian-x list relating to compiz, beryl and related stuff, which would make me very reluctant to enable anything by default. However, I will be the first to admit that I have not used any of it myself so far and don't know enough about it anyway. My mail was purely intended to make the people working on this take a step back and ask themselves if these new functionalities are really ready to be enabled by default. > Btw, i like the debconf suggestion too. Only if the question is only asked at lower debconf priorities and still have sensible defaults.
pgposFCgv4rnu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
