On Tue, Oct 17, 2006 at 02:34:11PM +0000, Sune Vuorela wrote: > Hi! > > I have started to wonder a bit about 'missing days' - a thing that is > especially importaint now when we are heading for a total freeze. > > >From http://packages.qa.debian.org/u/udev.html: > Too young, only 1 of 10 days old > [2006-10-15] Accepted 0.100-2.1 in unstable (low)
I got: Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 10:02:15 -0700 Which is before the dinstall run on the 15th. A few hours later dinstall runs. Yet a few hour later britney runs and sees it for the first time. At that point, it's 0 days old. Than 24 hours later, britney runs again, and it's 1 day old. In about 10 hours, britney will run again, and it will become 2 days old. > But here: > http://packages.qa.debian.org/k/kwin-style-crystal.html > Too young, only 1 of 10 days old > [2006-10-13] Accepted 1.0.2-1 in unstable (low) Date: Fri, 13 Oct 2006 14:48:15 -0700 Which is a few hours after the dinstall run on the 13th. A few hours later when britney runs, it doesn't see it yet. Britney only sees it more than 24h after it was uploaded. So it's 2 days old now. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
