James Vega <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 26, 2006 at 07:29:05PM +0200, Gernot Salzer wrote: >> Copyright: >> >> * xpbiff - popup biff for X >> * >> * Author: Kazuhiko Shutoh, 1993 >> * >> * Permission to use, copy, modify and distribute without charge this >> software, > > Doesn't the 'without charge' bit violate DFSG #1?
If it is meant as it is written, yes. Often sentences like this can also be read as "Permission, without charge, to use, copy, ...". But in this particular case the "without charge" seems to be quite clearly associated with "distribute". Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX/TeXLive)
