On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:40:54 +1000, Robert Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Sat, 2006-09-23 at 04:21 -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> URL's are not what would be needed. >> >> The information that is required could possibly be couched like so >> (RFC 2822 field folding) (for flex in stable) ,---- | >> XS-VCS-ARCH-Repo: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | >> http://arch.debian.org/arch/private/srivasta/archive-2003> | >> XS-VCS-ARCH-CONFIG: | ./flex/flex-2.5.31 | >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/flex--devo--2.5--versionfix-3 | >> ./flex/flex-2.5.31/debian | >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/debian-dir--flex--1.0--versionfix-4 >> | ./flex/flex-2.5.31/debian/common | >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/skeleton-make-rules--main--0.1--patch-13 >> `---- >> >> Hmm. This still does not provide a pointer to my archive gpg key. >> XS-VCS-ARCH-GPG-KEYID: 0x40612C84 > config-manager supports reading a config straight out of the VCS: > http://arch.debian.org/arch/private/srivasta/archive-2003/dists--debian--0/flex/flex-2.5.31.config > (for instance). > URI's accept parameters: > http://arch.debian.org/arch/private/srivasta/archive-2003;gpg-keyid=0x40612c84/dists--debian--0/flex/flex-2.5.31.config > (again, this is a for instance). That sounds good. Would this be an acceptable syntax for those proposing this new control file field? manoj -- A man may be so much of everything that he is nothing of anything. Samuel Johnson Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
