Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> It is my hope that #359855 will not exist in the new lilypond. >> However, this is just a hope. If ghostscript continues to have such a >> bug, then solving it will become of critical priority for getting >> lilypond into the release. > > Are your preliminary packages of 2.8 avaiable anywhere, as well as the > guile-1.8 packages? I wanted to try, but got more problems with 2.6 > which probably aren't worth reporting when we're trying to get 2.8 in.
I don't have the guile 1.8 packages; you could ask Rob Browning for them I assume. But Bill Allombert has helpfully provided a hint about what will solve the bug; if that works, I'll upload 2.6 now with the RC bugs fixed, and 2.8 as soon as feasible. Thomas
