hey james, On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 22:27 -0400, James Vega wrote: > It should just be a matter of removing the files from the old package > and letting the new ones take their place (with a backup if there are > any user changes). A little grepping around in /var/lib/dpkg/info > turned up this snippet for removing conffiles.
thanks for the suggestion, but if it's a choice between this and ucf, i
think ucf would be the lesser of two evils.
as a general rule relying on /var/lib/dpkg/anything should be greatly
frowned upon. what you suggest *would* work (though in the case that
the file is modified it could be kept there instead of made into a
backup copy), i can't in good conscience implement something like that.
i suppose i could store the md5sums of the conffiles in a seperate file
that is guaranteed to exist, but then i'm on my way to reimplementing
ucf and might as well just use ucf then.
thanks,
sean
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
