On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 02:26:52PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Sun, 2006-09-10 at 11:48 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > has been rejected by the list moderator. The moderator gave the > > > following reason for rejecting your request:
> > > "No reason given" > > Any maintainer doing such a braindead stupid thing - do not wonder if I > > reject your package without any comment in the future. > > The maintainer address has to be open to receive mail. It is fucking > > annyoing already that the damn "Your post needs a moderator" messages > > get back, rejecting legal mail is even worse. > Surely, you've *never* pressed or clicked the wrong button. > It would really help if people assumed that their fellow developers are > in good faith, and that something that seems unacceptable is just an > honest mistake until proven otherwise. Like this, or like the "BTS wars" > mails also of today. For my part, I find it pretty offensive that a mailing list that's set as the maintainer of a package would have mail filters configured this way in the first place. For the samba packaging team, for instance, I've taken pains to adjust the spam filters to allow bts mail in automatically before ever setting the maintainer field to point to the list; I would expect other packaging teams to take the same care. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
