severity 383493 serious
thanks

Hi,

On Thursday 17 August 2006 18:45, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
> FYI, I've now filed this as #383493.  (Filed as "important" rather than
> "serious" to avoid stepping on the toes of release people.)

I've learnt that not filing bugs with the appropriate severity does more harm 
than good. We do want Etch to comply with FHS 2.3, don't we?! :)

Note that FHS 2.1 didn't mention /usr/local/etc, while 2.3 does. I'd say this 
explains why we have this bug today.

http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/fhs/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY


regards,
        Holger

Attachment: pgpd3VGzzbVKe.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to