also sprach Kevin Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.08.14.1917 +0100]: > does that imply that an ITP is not checked against the current available > packages? Should there be a check?
The package was hardly current by the time the ITP was filed. In fact, I did not check whether it was simply a huge mail delay. The BTS is very slow these days. The ITP should have been filed a day or so before the package was uploaded just to allow for some feedback. But there are packages uploaded without ITPs, so this one is hardly a violation. I was just pointing it out. reportbug *does* check for existing packages when you file an ITP, I *think*. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system "it is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." -- aristoteles
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
