On Fri, Aug 11, 2006 at 10:27:39AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> > On Aug 10, Roger Leigh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> installed, all using the same configuration file. Is this a use > >> case we really want to support? Are there really setups running > >> multiple inetds for a good reason? Having a virtual > > A good reason usually is using features not available in a single > > package (especially inetd vs. inetd). > > It's not hard to manage anyway, my scheme allowed this. > We don't allow multiple mail-transport-agents, even though they have > different features. We don't allow multiple mtas because a mail-transport-agent is *required* to provide /usr/sbin/sendmail. There is no such file conflict for most of these other network services. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
