Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is the stupidiest thing you ever did, because everyone had to look > at your handling of your packages. Everybody saw your gcc-4.1 RC with > a patch which you're blocking until the new upstream release. > Everybody saw the awful packaging mistakes you did. You can close or > downgrade the bugs I reported, it's too late.
Actually, I didn't make those "packaging mistakes"; the previous maintainer did. But I'm not somehow trying to keep secrets or claim some moral high ground. You seem to think this is a battle, in which there is a winner and a loser. I don't. > I heard from multiple sources that the problem with the new upstream > release was not at all caused by the default python version -- as you > claimed -- but either by a higher guile requirement. No, it requires *both* the newer Python *and* the newer Guile. You are not paying attention. You are instead trying to get by with minimal understanding, proclaiming how deficient I am, reporting so far *three* bugs, one of which is not a bug, and the other two of which are *clearly* wishlist items; indeed, in one of the reports *you yourself* indicate that it's a wishlist item. Grow up.
