[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes: > On Jul 25, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I agree that we already have equivalent functionality for /proc values >> so makes sense to have it in too. > No, wishing a feature-complete set of configuration file for aestethical > reasons is not enough to move more stuff to base.
So let's remove setctl from base. -- O T A V I O S A L V A D O R --------------------------------------------- E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN: 5906116 GNU/Linux User: 239058 GPG ID: 49A5F855 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio --------------------------------------------- "Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives you the whole house." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]