[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:

> On Jul 25, Otavio Salvador <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I agree that we already have equivalent functionality for /proc values
>> so makes sense to have it in too.
> No, wishing a feature-complete set of configuration file for aestethical
> reasons is not enough to move more stuff to base.

So let's remove setctl from base.

-- 
        O T A V I O    S A L V A D O R
---------------------------------------------
 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]      UIN: 5906116
 GNU/Linux User: 239058     GPG ID: 49A5F855
 Home Page: http://www.freedom.ind.br/otavio
---------------------------------------------
"Microsoft gives you Windows ... Linux gives
 you the whole house."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to