This one time, at band camp, Thomas Bushnell BSG said: > And finally, if we don't care about standards conformance, I have said > that a good second-best is to document exactly what our requirements > are, rather than burying them in apparent secrecy.
What standards, exactly? Can you be specific? I have seen you assert this several times, but I see nothing in the RFCs preventing a site from saying it has a temporary local problem when it doesn't. You've been asked this before in response to your assertion, and haven't answered. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- | ,''`. Stephen Gran | | : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer | | `- http://www.debian.org | -----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
