also sprach Thijs Kinkhorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.07.16.1521 +0200]: > But more importantly, I don't think that strictly requiring that a > package is lintian errors clean is a good idea anyway. Suppose that > there's a security bug in a package that I want to fix quickly. Lintian > yields an error that was already present in the previous package. I > can't upload just the security fix unless I fix that other error aswell.
First, which certificates are required can be defined for each source package. Second, I could well imagine an override-style certificate for emergency uploads. About running logcheck on the server, the problem is simply the time it takes until the user gets feedback, and server load. -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system "i think, therefore i'm single" -- lizz winstead
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
