Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ah, I see the confusion (or maybe have some of my own). I am not talking > about a GPL application that has been modified to use libssl. I am > talking about a GPL application that uses a library, and that library > could or could not link to libssl - the higher level application does > not itself care or notice. I am not talking about changing the GPL > application to directly use the GPL incompatible library. Maybe that > applies to gnucash, but I'm trying to understand the more general case.
Right. So, you cannot distribute binaries if they do, in fact, link to ssl. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
