-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Steve Langasek wrote: [...] >> Anyway, as noted in my previous mail to this thread, when testing this >> method on unstable and sarge, I hit a bug in apt that rules it out for >> etch. If you still like this method, we can get the necessary fixes in >> and promote it for etch+1, though. > > IMHO it definitely seems worth doing.
IMHOtoo. I liked this solution for renaming a package, because its quite simple to implement and provides a seamless upgrade. Even though renaming a package is probably not something which is done every day, having a clean solution for it would be a good thing. Regards, Andreas - -- Andreas Fester mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] WWW: http://www.littletux.net ICQ: 326674288 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFEgLiLZ3bQVzeW+rsRAtqGAJ9CSQHgkYt79jQEe0UT0gt7HsZKfACdGPMp qfYEq2tWN1bUMwuyM/athGM= =XP76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
