On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 04:16:47PM +0200, Thomas Weber wrote: > is it possible for a 'building' package to send a mail to the buildd > admin of the current buildd machine (i.e. something like > [EMAIL PROTECTED])?
Usually (at least for most m68k buildds) the buildd runs under *surprise* the use "buildd". Mail to that user is forwarded by buildd-mail to the buildd admin. > Sending this problem to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list > didn't fix it for all machines, as can be seen at > http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=octaviz%26ver=0.4.0-26% > 26arch=ia64%26stamp=1149076049%26file=log > (search for '2005'). > Now, I would like to add something to debian/rules that checks for the > state (auto/manual) of this symlink and sends a mail to the buildd admin > if the state is 'manual'. Thus, only involved admins would be bothered. > Alternatively, I could add > update-alternatives --auto octave-config > to debian/rules; but I don't know if this is acceptable. > Suggestions? Hmmm, on http://www.buildd.net/ there are contact addresses listed beside almost every buildd, if you want to contact certain buildd admins directly. -- Ciao... // Fon: 0381-2744150 Ingo \X/ SIP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gpg pubkey: http://www.juergensmann.de/ij/public_key.asc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
