On Fri, 5 May 2006 18:56:21 +0200, Pierre Habouzit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that would obviously mean two signatures per package (but I don't > think that's that much work)
Considered that we are currently waiting since months (half a year?) for a security feature that used to work and has been disabled on purpose to be allowed again, I don't think that it is adviseable to propose any changes that need ftpmaster approval. >IMHO, changing the key every year at any date is not problematic at all, >because there is plenty of solution to do smooth replacement of the >key. Provided that the infrastructure maintainers play along, which is too much to expect for the current holders of this job. Remember, they're volunteers, and you cannot force them to do their job. Greetings Marc -- -------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! ----- Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/ Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
