Gustavo Franco wrote: > [snip] > > Thanks for this. I'm using backuppc at work and was considering to > move our backups to bacula after upgrading our current hardware setup. > Package updates and bug squashing in general was on the roadmap. :-) Bacula (specially 1.38.x is much better... hopefully you'll be delighted) > That would be good if you, Jose and probably others joined a 'bacula' > group in alioth to keep this in group maintenance. I have offered John co-maintenance recently.
I previously declined very 'consistent' offers to adopt/take over Bacula, and offered co-maintenance instead. One of the main reasons: i have quite good relations with upstream (almost made them move main development to Debian -- will try again soon) and understand our user's problems quite well. Additionally, quite a lot of users have already contacted me. > Hopefully i would be able to join with real work in the next month. > Thoughts? You would be more than welcome... specially if you are any good with Postgres. I know that the current postinst could be better (was contributed and can't say much) Some work a much needed dbconfig-common migration would be very interesting, too (i don't feel i have resources enough to tackle that on my own) > Closing, do you think it will be possible to ship in Etch a "backup > server" task using bacula ? I think that's all up to add more stuff in > debconf and prepare the task itself. Probably a goal for the first > 'group upload', if you agree. I couldn't be happier if that happened. We have a bit less than 3 months (until Etch freezes) to get all of this in shape. Any other volunteers? J.L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]