Dear Steinar, I'm not an expert on NFS/SunRPC so I cannot say it would be good or bad to assign fixed port numbers on debian BY DEFAULT.
Regards, David ----- Original Message ----- > On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 06:36:59AM -0500, David McGiven wrote: > > The newer 2.6 series kernels support configuring the TCP/UDP port number > > of the kernel lockd via the files /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_tcpport and > > /proc/sys/fs/nfs/nlm_udpport. > > Actually, I've been considering locking both lockd, mountd and statd to given > ports (see bugs #231074 and #289958, for instance) by default, but there are > two things that must be considered first: > > 1. What ports? Is there anything remotely standardized? Can I just grab a > few ports that look unused? > 2. The nfs-utils maintainer's opinion about the whole issue; I've been > working a bit on the package, but he still has the final word :-) > > BTW, this would probably have been more appropriate as a bug (possibly > wishlist) against nfs-utils. > > /* Steinar */ > -- > Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ > > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
