On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > Those cases can be treated differently than failures due to other > > reasons, though. > > Uh, yes; and they are. But that's not the point. > > The point really is that build failures rarely need maintainer > intervention. Bothering the maintainer with things that do not concern > them, therefore, seems of little point to me.
And of course build failures that the maintainer must solve will result in FTBFS bugs (sooner or later). And these will go to the PTS like all the bugs. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
