Miles Bader wrote: >>> - evince >>> >> Any particular reason for not just using xpdf? > > Especially since xpdf seems to do a much better job of rendering many > pdf documents... [Evince has nicer looking widgets though.]
Not only that, but Evince can be quite slow at rendering complex documents. Of course, everything highly depends on your definition of "light". If I were to make a list of packages for a "light" desktop, my selection would be entirely different. I am not saying that current selection is bad in any way. It contains most of the packages I would expect to see on a _modern_ desktop machine. But as for "light", it can certainly be much much lighter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
