Scripsit Katipo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > What's the general consensus on this?
> http://www.eiffel.com/general/news/2006/2006_04_05_pr.html The press release ought to have been clearer. It took me about a dozen clicks from their press release to discover that the unspecified "Open source license" they talk about is actually the GPL. However, GPLing of formerly non-free software is always good. On the other hand, the tarball download located another half-dozen clicks away contains C files with no GPL blurb at the top, and no file named COPYING in the tarball. On the other hand, there's also a SVN download option which I have not tried, but it may be more explicitly released. -- Henning Makholm "Ambiguous cases are defined as those for which the compiler being used finds a legitimate interpretation which is different from that which the user had in mind." -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
