On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 11:51:26AM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > Le Mar 11 Avril 2006 11:05, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > I'm assuming libc6 depends on libc-bin and libc-bin depends on libc6 > > here. The former is needed to always pull in libc-bin on upgrades and > > the later is needed to ensure the minimum version requirements as > > sepcified in libc6.shlibs. We don't want a new libc-bin with a too > > old libc6. > riiiiight, but that makes a nasty circular dependency I thought we > should avoid at any rate ? Shouldn't libc-bin rather conflicts with bad > version of the libc ? No. Having libc-bin conflict with libc doesn't help you make sure libc-bin is pulled into the system, which is what you need. (There are no "bad versions" of libc here; there are versions that need libc-bin, and there are versions that don't, and you need some way to pull libc-bin in for those versions that do need it.) -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
