Richard B. Kreckel writes: > Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > >Your package fails to build with G++ 4.1. I'm filing this bug as > >important for now, but when 4.1 will be the default compiler in > >unstable (probably in a few weeks) I'll upgrade this to serious. > > > > > Jeez, according to my available list, gcc-4.1 is not even in sid, yet. > We are duplicating efforts since patches for gcc-4.1 have been applied > upstream and I'm aware of them since a while ago. > > Maybe it would be more productive to calm down a bit and let people play > with that compiler a bit before making it the default.
if you didn't play with it in the past five months, why would you "play" with it now? I appreciate Ben's work to make the archive buildable with 4.1. Matthias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
