su, 2006-03-12 kello 15:49 +0100, Peter Kourzanov kirjoitti: > Can anyone please explain why this architecture is named hurd-i386 > rather that i386-hurd?
I guess it just happened to seem like a good name at the time. Why, is there a problem with the name? Does it matter? Debian architecture names are, after all, pretty much atomic and unparseable. -- I am an artist. Source code is my canvas, a programming language is my paint. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
