Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-02 05:08]: >> Joey has been campaigning [1] for a while to get everything in the >> archive changed to depend on debconf | debconf-2.0 or similar rather >> than just debconf, in order that we can start rolling out cdebconf >> as its replacement. > > It would be nice if you could tell _why_ you're interested in > migrating to cdebconf. What does it have that debconf doesn't, or > what other advantages does it have? Is it easier to maintain, > smaller, ...?
Two reasons I can think of: Its smaller, and it does not depend on perl. -- CYa, Mario -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
