Lionel Elie Mamane a écrit :
On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 07:42:25PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
To get things rolling, I have prepared an updated glibc for sarge with
just the timezone data updated to the latest upstream upstream. It is
at http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/glibc/ . Technically right now it
is correct neither as a NMU (wrong version number, not mentioned in
changelog), nor as MU (because I'm not a glibc maintainer).
http://people.debian.org/~lmamane/glibc/glibc_22-sarge0.diff is the
interdiff (the difference between what's now in sarge and what I've
prepared).
So:
- glibc maintainers, would you approve of such an update to a point
release of sarge?
I am *one* of the glibc maintainer, and I agree in principle with such a
change, though I haven't look very deeply at your patch (will do that
later).
I hope other glibc maintainers will give their opinion there.
If yes, shall I make an NMU of it or shall you prepare a package
(replace my "-- " line in the changelog by one of yours) and submit
it to joey?
- Martin, would you take such an update if approved or submitted by
the glibc maintainers?
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
