Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Looking at the first packages alphabetically in (main/)admin, one > could ask the same question of a great many packages. The aboot* > packages assume you have DEC/HP's SRM firmware on your machine. > acorn-fdisk assumes that you have the Acorn RISC OS. acpid assumes > you have an ACPI-compatible BIOS. adtool is for a piece of software > written by Microsoft, identified by a trademark registered to > Microsoft. What is the difference between ndiswrapper and these tools > that assume or require you have non-free software in your system, and > are written to let Debian interoperate with that non-free software?
I'm not sure there is a difference, but I'm not going to accept as a premise that there are no categorization mistakes, especially when I'm trying to figure out whether there has been one in this case or not. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
