On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:50:16PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > Or, perhaps it's not true that there are no free drivers for it. The > claim was also made that there was a single free driver out there for > use with ndiswrapper, but others claimed that the hardware in question > is already supported, and better, without the use of that driver.
The crip driver is actually not made for a specific piece of hardware; it's really an encryption layer. I fail to see whether if something works "better" is important. Using OpenOffice.org also works "better" than using Microsoft Office under wine, yet I have seen _many_ people asking whether it is possible to do so. > I don't know whether this is true, but if it is true, I would > appreciate hearing why that should be treated differently than there > being no such free driver at all. I would appreciate hearing why you would think that it should be treated the same. There is a driver, it is free, it works with ndiswrapper, so there is a use case. Why should one perception on its usefulness be relevant? -- Fun will now commence -- Seven Of Nine, "Ashes to Ashes", stardate 53679.4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
